Total MarketCap: $0 0
24H Vol: $0.00
BTC:
0 sat/vB
ETH: Gwei
EN
Dark

SearchSSI/Mag7/Meme/ETF/Coin/Index/Charts/Research
00:00
00:0000:00
00:00 / 00:00
    Markets
    Indexes
    NewsFeed
    TokenBar®
    Analysis
    Macro
    Watchlist
Bar 🍻
Posts
Followers
Follow
Share to
$0+2.66%
Translated title to
View Original
Translation by ChatGPT
Handshake
More Detail
$0
+2.66%
Total dollar volume24H
$60,794
High24H
0.01069 USDT
Low24H
0.00962 USDT
Market Cap
#806$6,873,879
FDV
$6,874,042
Market Cap / FDV Ratio
1.00
Turnover rate
0.88%
Circulating supply
672,590,894
Total supply
672,606,851
Max supply
2,040,000,000
All time high
0.01176 USDT
All time high date
Aug 23, 2025
Down from All time high
-13.10%
Cycle low
0.00832 USDT
Cycle low date
Aug 23, 2025
Up from cycle low
22.82%
Official links
Website
White paper
Socials
Twitter
Telegram
Reddit
Discord
Introduction
Handshake is a decentralized, permissionless naming protocol where every peer is validating and in charge of managing the root DNS naming zone with the goal of creating an alternative to existing Certificate Authorities and naming systems. Names on the internet (top level domains, social networking handles, etc.) ultimately rely upon centralized actors with full control over a system which are relied upon to be honest, as they are vulnerable to hacking, censorship, and corruption. Handshake aims to experiment with new ways the internet can be more secure, resilient, and socially useful with a peer-to-peer system validated by the network's participants. Handshake is an experiment which seeks to explore those new ways in which the necessary tools to build a more decentralized internet. Services on the internet have become more centralized beginning in the 1990s, but do not fulfill the original decentralized vision of the internet. Email became Gmail, usenet became reddit, blog replies became facebook and Medium, pingbacks became twitter, squid became Cloudflare, even gnutella became The Pirate Bay. Centralization exists because there is a need to manage spam, griefing, and sockpuppet/sybil attacks. Previous decentralized systems largely stopped working due to spam. If it were more costly to grief on the internet using decentralized systems, the need for trusted centralized corporations to manage these risks decrease. Internet services and platforms may benefit from building on top of a decentralized system which is specifically designed for resilience against sybil attacks. As we may redecentralize.
TermsPrivacy PolicyWhitePaperOfficial VerificationSoDEXSSICookieBlog
sha512-gmb+mMXJiXiv+eWvJ2SAkPYdcx2jn05V/UFSemmQN07Xzi5pn0QhnS09TkRj2IZm/UnUmYV4tRTVwvHiHwY2BQ==
sha512-kYWj302xPe4RCV/dCeCy7bQu1jhBWhkeFeDJid4V8+5qSzhayXq80dsq8c+0s7YFQKiUUIWvHNzduvFJAPANWA==